A recording played during the bail hearing of former deputy national police commissioner Shadrack Sibiya has raised new allegations regarding connections among businessman Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala, police intermediaries, and figures mentioned in the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry.
The recording features a conversation between businessman Serge Cabonge and a man referred to in court as Mr M, the father of one of the complainants in the case against Sibiya. The State argues the recording is crucial for assessing Sibiya’s character and suggests he might interfere with witnesses if granted bail.
In the exchange, Cabonge discusses his relationship with Matlala and refutes claims regarding his dealings with Sibiya. He also mentions a man called “Fani”, linked to allegations surrounding police intermediaries and criminal networks. A key allegation from Cabonge is that he knows someone involved with the Madlanga Commission who advised him to leave the country and would offer protection if his name arose during the proceedings.
The recording includes references to a disputed vehicle collision that Cabonge claims he resolved through his connections. Details about the person allegedly offering protection and the veracity of the accusations remain unclear.
Additionally, speculation arises regarding Tebogo Thobejane, Matlala’s former girlfriend, and what she might know about the murder of whistleblower Babita Deokaran. However, these claims have not been substantiated and do not connect Thobejane to Deokaran’s death.
The recording has sparked a debate between the State and the defence regarding its relevance. Investigating officer Sergeant Nokukhanya Ndlovu confirmed the voices of Cabonge and Mr M. The defence contends that although the witness can identify the individuals, she cannot interpret a conversation she did not participate in, arguing for consideration of the broader context of the communications.
Furthermore, the defence noted that the recording was sent to Sibiya’s wife, Sizakele Dlamini, alleging an attempt to exert pressure on her concerning financial matters or the withdrawal of the case.
This dispute follows earlier evidence about interactions between Mr M and Dlamini. In a previous affidavit, Dlamini expressed concerns over Mr M’s actions and his claims regarding possessing recordings and information pertinent to Sibiya.
The State maintains that the recordings are significant due to concerns about potential witness interference, while the defence contests this interpretation and seeks to prove the importance of context. The bail hearing for Sibiya has been postponed to Wednesday amidst these developments. The defence is seeking additional time to consult with Sibiya and obtain further instructions.
